Capital Combat Feedback

[Deleted]

Oct 25, 2014 12:23:28 GMT -5 @blaineharrison said:

Considering he's held the secondary title for six months, he's probably at least in consideration if there were to be a number one contenders match.

Or what Malik said...

I wouldn't have a problem with this. Guaranteed title shot is fine too.

I feel like people are overly defensive about this though. It's just my opinion.

[LΞCAVALIΞR]

Now, if anyone here is guilty of being defensive in this while thing, then it's me...cause hey, I write as Riley right? And if I annoyed or found anyone with my comments, then I apologize.

My frustration came from this bit: 

When it comes to the top title, the best writer in the fed should be facing the second best writer in the fed. That's how I've always felt about it anyway.

To me, that statement reads "you don't deserve to be contending."

Now I'm not going to sit here and tell you I'm the best writer because that's a lie. But I can say that each week I sitting down and try to give you all the best RP I can write. And I think I can fairly say that I've transitioned Riley into one of the top faces in FGA; I'm certain most people would agree.

And lastly, there is the "title shoot" itself I suppose. As others have stated before me, the stipulation to my match at Above & Beyond was for a future world title shoot. That was talked about in segments, in RPs, in results, and I re-mentioned it in my last RP. 

So in closing, yes, we all know it's just a game and what not. But, I did get frustrated because I've been working extremely hard; and, all this "story stuff" has been known and established for months.